Education can and should be a personal transformation process. Some people sustain that it is not possible to learn or develop basic traits of character after a certain age. This view is based on an outmoded Freudian theory according to which the basic features of personality are acquired and fixed before reaching adolescence –another extreme conception goes further and states that they are formed at mother’s womb. However, many contemporary education theorists and psychologists accept that many skills and traits can be learnt and developed in maturity if the necessary attitudes are cultivated. An example of this current is explored in “Can Ethics Be Taught?”, a very interesting book by several Harvard Business School scholars that deals with the question of whether ethics can be taught and learnt at business school by young managers and responds in the positive. Indeed, at business schools we work on the premise that junior and senior managers can not only update their knowledge on the latest business tools but also perfect their skills and further shape their personality –hopefully for the better- through education.
In this same spirit, Francisco Marin commented earlier in this blog about the importance of cultivating a series of virtues while studying an Executive MBA programme and he specifically mentions curiosity, humility and common sense as basic for good management. I agree with him. In particular, curiosity –in its best possible meaning- is concomitant to wisdom and a necessary virtue for the advancement of knowledge and even for achieving self-fulfilment and happiness.
Virtues are character traits valued as being good or, in other words, operative good habits. They are not innate, but rather achieved by constant exercise. It is never late to start practising or perfect these good habits and management education can be a transforming experience in this way. How can business school professors help their students cultivate these virtues or competencies? This question is related to a previous comment made by Der Chao Chen in this blog. To answer this question, the best analogy I find is taken from sculptor. Michelangelo, the great artist, believed that the job of the sculptor is to free the forms that were already inside the stone. The job of professors could be interpreted in a similar way: i.e.freeing a students potential.
Tags(clickable): Freud, Michelangelo, Harvard, Harvard Business School